Sometimes you just go HUM M !!!!
The article caught my attention because the reasons given for rejection are wholly unscientific and truly indefensible yet they are expressed as boldly as can be. No really! The author of the reply, Dr. Nicola Gulley, literally used the actual bold herself:
Summarising, the simplistic comparison of ranges from AR4, AR5, and Otto et al, combined with the statement they are inconsistent is less then helpful, actually it…
View original post 529 more words